The dual peril of unfettered migration into Europe
and the United States has a different complexion of invaders, but both suffer an appalling economic aftermath. However, the
flood gates from the Middle East and Africa “so called” refugees are destined to overcome and hasten the breakup
of the European Union. Just note the impact from not defending the borders of Europe, both placing terminal pressure on the
economies and finances of EU countries, but also from the social dissolution of Western societies.
“Luxembourg Finance Minister Pierre Gramegna said Friday the EU's executive
Commission will "analyze whether the refugee crisis can be considered an extraordinary circumstance" under rules
the bloc has to ensure sound public finances.
Gramegna also said the European Investment Bank also stands ready to quickly help countries,
regions and cities that need financial help to deal with the arrival of migrants.”
Sure there will be funds made available to spread out the burdensome costs from
this influx of cultural aliens, but what is the ultimate goal?
“The
EU’s leaders can muddle along with broken institutions, flouted laws, flailing border police. Or they can think it through.
The OECD’s central projection is that, to stand a chance of avoiding stagnation, the EU’s workforce will have
to add 50 million more people through migration by 2060 (a similar number is needed in the US). The Paris-based think tank
says if that doesn’t happen, it is a “significant downside risk” to growth. What this means should be spelled
out, because no politician has bothered to do so: to avoid economic stagnation in the long term, Europe needs migrants.
Consent for inward economic
migration is fragile and falling – as evidenced by the sudden rush by politicians and tabloids to reclassify the Syrian
exodus as a special case. Even if populist resistance to migration stops short of fascism, and even if anti-migration parties
are disempowered by the electoral system, their existence highlights a failing consensus. And that is, in turn, founded on
economic failure. The Eurozone has produced an arc of stagnation and discontent along its southern border. There is mass unemployment
in the very countries that have become the first port of call for migrants and refugees.”
The ridiculous supposition that an influx of migrates is needed to resolve the
unemployment problem, testifies to the upside down thinking that the global elites are selling to a gullible public.
“The
rising concerns on ageing have unsurprisingly been accompanied by more accommodative policies on immigration; the number of
countries with stated plans to grow their populations via immigration has gone up to 22 as of 2013, from 10 in 2010 (note
that immigrants also tend to have higher fertility rates).
But for many countries, people inflows are only part of the solution. In order
to maintain current levels of retirees/working age population ratios in 2025, immigration rates in Western Europe need to
be 7x-8x higher than current run rate (based on UN estimates), while in Japan and Korea, the requirement goes up to a highly
improbable 26x and 58x current levels.”
If
the socialism nirvana is short on procreation, maybe the answer is for a 21th century version of Lebensborn "Spring of Life" variation. “Lebensborn was designed to halt the high rate of abortions in Germany which
rose as high as 800,000 a year in the inter-war years because of a chronic shortage of men to marry after World War I.”
Analyze the effects of overrunning millions of
foreigners residing in European countries competing for work or tapping into a social welfare system. The economic price from
driving down wages only benefits the globalists. When the globe is on the verge of a worldwide depression, does anyone with
a sane mind really believe that adding huge numbers of unskilled workers to struggling economies will achieve prosperity?
America has suffered for decades
from the illegal aliens that trespass into out country. Just examine the damage to our demographics from the anchor baby malady.
Europe is even less equipped to accommodate
the physical warehousing of unwanted intruders. If the world was so consumed by humanitarian altruism, why not set up a one
way eastern direction silk road and send all these refugees to China to help occupy all those housing units in Chinese ghost
cities?
The Saudi’s and Chinese have no interest in imploding their own cultures with the inundating of outsiders.
Yet the corporatists who run the means of production are committed to the de-industrialization of Western economies.
Europe is being systematically disassembled and shares
the same fate as a destroyed America. Democratic socialism created the EU as a fascist tyrant over sovereign national countries.
The financial elites operate their economic empires under the protection of “Free Trade” monopolies.
The economic cost from this latest refugee invasion
hastens the demise of competing business endeavors. So when the European Investment Bank is ready to loan money to pay for
the arrival of migrants, you know the banksters are behind the manufactured crisis.
